Re: Core reported from vaccum function.

From: "Mavinakuli, Prasanna (STSD)" <prasanna(dot)b-m(at)hp(dot)com>
To: "Alvaro Herrera" <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Rao, Srikanth R (STSD)" <srikanth-r(dot)rao-k(at)hp(dot)com>, "Racharla, Chakravarthy (STSD)" <chakravarthy(dot)racharla(at)hp(dot)com>, "Manchenahalli, Raghunandan (STSD)" <raghunandan(dot)manchenahalli(at)hp(dot)com>, "Hebbar, Raghavendra (STSD)" <raaghav(at)hp(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Core reported from vaccum function.
Date: 2007-08-01 03:19:40
Message-ID: FFE5D42C74BFBE48A79FA506C15E1E7C06B2AAEC@bgeexc04.asiapacific.cpqcorp.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general


Fine.Thanks for all your suggestions and time.

Thanks a lot,
Prasanna.
-----Original Message-----
From: Alvaro Herrera [mailto:alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com]
Sent: Wednesday, August 01, 2007 8:48 AM
To: Mavinakuli, Prasanna (STSD)
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org; Tom Lane; Rao, Srikanth R (STSD);
Racharla, Chakravarthy (STSD); Manchenahalli, Raghunandan (STSD);
Hebbar, Raghavendra (STSD)
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Core reported from vaccum function.

Mavinakuli, Prasanna (STSD) wrote:

> Hello Alvaro,
>
> Thanks Alvaro for your time and suggestions.Yes we do understand that
> we are expected to use the higher versions.But as Bruce pointed out
> already,the same is NOT recommended when there is NO imperative
> reason.Hence we were just in the process of validating and justifying
> the upgrade.

You are mistaken. Bruce said exactly the opposite.

--
Alvaro Herrera
http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2007-08-01 03:21:04 Re: Core reported from vaccum function.
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2007-08-01 03:17:57 Re: Core reported from vaccum function.