From: | Dave Page <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk> |
---|---|
To: | 'Rod Taylor' <rbt(at)zort(dot)ca>, pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: RFD: PostgreSQL Schema Support |
Date: | 2002-04-05 14:43:36 |
Message-ID: | FED2B709E3270E4B903EB0175A49BCB1293356@dogbert.vale-housing.co.uk |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgadmin-hackers |
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Rod Taylor [mailto:rbt(at)zort(dot)ca]
> Sent: 05 April 2002 15:34
> To: Dave Page; pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
> Subject: Re: [pgadmin-hackers] RFD: PostgreSQL Schema Support
>
>
> Option 2 is certainly the best long term. A couple of
> releases from now and very few people will be using 7.2 or
> prior -- and they should expect newer tools to be broken .
>
> Support namespaces in the cleanest way possible, and
> potentially add a temporary hack (for the length of 7.3.x
> releases and maybe part of
> 7.4) to support 7.2 and prior with a 'pg_public' or default
> namespace. ie. Pretend a namespace exists for public stuff,
> as when they upgrade to 7.3 that would be where it all ends
> up (I think), so it's somwhat appropriate.
It sounds so obvious - I'm gutted I didn't think of that myself :-).
Thanks Rod.
Dave.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tim Finch, FosterFinch Ltd | 2002-04-05 16:22:34 | Re: RFD: PostgreSQL Schema Support |
Previous Message | Rod Taylor | 2002-04-05 14:34:04 | Re: RFD: PostgreSQL Schema Support |