| From: | Dave Page <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk> |
|---|---|
| To: | "'Mark A(dot) Taff'" <mark(at)libertycreek(dot)net>, pgadmin-hackers <pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: controls |
| Date: | 2002-02-19 20:11:57 |
| Message-ID: | FED2B709E3270E4B903EB0175A49BCB10475B7@dogbert.vale-housing.co.uk |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgadmin-hackers |
Mark,
Yes, when there is a need, then a control may be appropriate. The
(unwritten) rules are:
- Only use controls where necessary
- Only use standard Microsoft or home brewed controls
- Use the normal pgAdmin licence - certainly *no* GPL (they're not
compatible - that's why the Migration Wizard is a seperate download).
- We add them under /activex in the source tree
Regards, Dave.
-----Original Message-----
From: Mark A. Taff [mailto:mark(at)libertycreek(dot)net]
Sent: 19 February 2002 19:50
To: pgadmin-hackers
Subject: [pgadmin-hackers] controls
Dave,
As the HBX is a user-control, am I correct to presume that it is
OK to make our own user-controls? I can't think of any neat way to do the
desired entity relationship-diagramming module without user-controls.
Regards,
Mark
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Dave Page | 2002-02-19 20:20:52 | Re: Pseudo modification of views and triggers |
| Previous Message | Dave Page | 2002-02-19 20:04:22 | Re: [GENERAL] MDB 2 POSTGRESQL MIGRATION PROBLE |