From: | "Tena Sakai" <tsakai(at)gallo(dot)ucsf(dot)edu> |
---|---|
To: | "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | "Rob Sargent" <robjsargent(at)gmail(dot)com>, <pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: it's not NULL, then what is it? |
Date: | 2009-07-01 17:47:36 |
Message-ID: | FE44E0D7EAD2ED4BB2165071DB8E328C04E84C0D@egcrc-ex01.egcrc.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-sql |
Many thanks, Tom.
I wish I had known "\pset null nil" trick.
It would have saved a few unnecessary emails.
Regards,
Tena Sakai
tsakai(at)gallo(dot)ucsf(dot)edu
-----Original Message-----
From: Tom Lane [mailto:tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us]
Sent: Wed 7/1/2009 10:42 AM
To: Tena Sakai
Cc: Rob Sargent; pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [SQL] it's not NULL, then what is it?
"Tena Sakai" <tsakai(at)gallo(dot)ucsf(dot)edu> writes:
>> So they were null,
> Yes!
>> and null turns out to be a seven-character blank string!?
> I don't understand how that happens. Mr Tom Lane
> hinted that it might be a bug in sprintf...
Well, that was before I read the messages where it turned out that they
were actually nulls after all.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tim Haak | 2009-07-02 09:31:04 | Re: Partitioned tables not using index for min and max 8.2.7? |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2009-07-01 17:44:46 | Re: Partitioned tables not using index for min and max 8.2.7? |