Re: it's not NULL, then what is it?

From: "Tena Sakai" <tsakai(at)gallo(dot)ucsf(dot)edu>
To: "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "Rob Sargent" <robjsargent(at)gmail(dot)com>, <pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: it's not NULL, then what is it?
Date: 2009-07-01 17:47:36
Message-ID: FE44E0D7EAD2ED4BB2165071DB8E328C04E84C0D@egcrc-ex01.egcrc.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-sql

Many thanks, Tom.

I wish I had known "\pset null nil" trick.
It would have saved a few unnecessary emails.

Regards,

Tena Sakai
tsakai(at)gallo(dot)ucsf(dot)edu

-----Original Message-----
From: Tom Lane [mailto:tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us]
Sent: Wed 7/1/2009 10:42 AM
To: Tena Sakai
Cc: Rob Sargent; pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [SQL] it's not NULL, then what is it?

"Tena Sakai" <tsakai(at)gallo(dot)ucsf(dot)edu> writes:
>> So they were null,

> Yes!

>> and null turns out to be a seven-character blank string!?

> I don't understand how that happens. Mr Tom Lane
> hinted that it might be a bug in sprintf...

Well, that was before I read the messages where it turned out that they
were actually nulls after all.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-sql by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tim Haak 2009-07-02 09:31:04 Re: Partitioned tables not using index for min and max 8.2.7?
Previous Message Tom Lane 2009-07-01 17:44:46 Re: Partitioned tables not using index for min and max 8.2.7?