From: | Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se> |
---|---|
To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org> |
Cc: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>, Greg Sabino Mullane <htamfids(at)gmail(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Michael Banck <mbanck(at)gmx(dot)net>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Enable data checksums by default |
Date: | 2024-10-16 08:01:37 |
Message-ID: | FCB82EB9-16BF-4999-AC8E-4F9F3F86E4B1@yesql.se |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> On 16 Oct 2024, at 09:49, Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org> wrote:
> Ah yes, and the upgrade tests on the buildfarm don't like this. What shall we do about this? Maybe adjust the buildfarm scripts to use --no-data-checksums?
I can't see many other options, and it represents a reasonable use-case, so +1.
--
Daniel Gustafsson
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Fujii Masao | 2024-10-16 09:52:40 | Re: ECPG Refactor: move sqlca variable in ecpg_log() |
Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2024-10-16 08:00:15 | Re: Doc: typo in config.sgml |