Re: [HACKERS] Can ICU be used for a database's default sort order?

From: Vladimir Borodin <root(at)simply(dot)name>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Can ICU be used for a database's default sort order?
Date: 2018-01-31 16:48:28
Message-ID: FC4E83A9-3229-4B32-AF41-9A525B72BE02@simply.name
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi.

> 23 июня 2017 г., в 21:32, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> написал(а):
>
> On 6/22/17 23:10, Peter Geoghegan wrote:
>> On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 7:10 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>>> Is there some way I'm missing, or is this just a not-done-yet feature?
>>
>> It's a not-done-yet feature.
>
> It's something I hope to address soon.

Will it work only for a particular database? Or for a whole cluster during initdb also? Any chance to get this done in 11?

--
May the force be with you…
https://simply.name

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2018-01-31 16:53:25 Re: JIT compiling with LLVM v9.0
Previous Message Yugo Nagata 2018-01-31 16:44:44 Re: CURRENT OF causes an error when IndexOnlyScan is used