| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Libpq PGRES_COPY_BOTH - version compatibility |
| Date: | 2011-03-27 20:31:06 |
| Message-ID: | FB92E9D1-C6C5-4444-8FF7-3CA20EF74FB3@gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mar 27, 2011, at 4:09 PM, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> wrote:
> That doesn't mean we shouldn't do this (haven't reconsidered the whole
> thread) - but it doesn't solve the issue I originally raised.
I'm somewhat inclined to just remove this from the list of open items. It doesn't seem clear what the action item is here, or even that there is one, so holding up beta for it doesn't seem right. When/if we figure out what needs to be done, we can revisit the issue.
Anyone disagree?
...Robert
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | David Fetter | 2011-03-27 21:07:13 | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Fix plpgsql to release SPI plans when a function or DO block is |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2011-03-27 20:26:12 | Re: Performance Farm Release |