Re: Patch: Improve Boolean Predicate JSON Path Docs

From: "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)justatheory(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Erik Wienhold <ewie(at)ewie(dot)name>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Patch: Improve Boolean Predicate JSON Path Docs
Date: 2024-01-21 19:24:12
Message-ID: FB75F45B-7D0D-4CD1-AD7F-1AF6A1AD0311@justatheory.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Jan 20, 2024, at 12:34, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:

> It will take a predicate, but seems to always return true:
>
> regression=# select '{"a":[1,2,3,4,5]}'::jsonb @? '$.a[*] < 5' ;
> ?column?
> ----------
> t
> (1 row)
>
> regression=# select '{"a":[1,2,3,4,5]}'::jsonb @? '$.a[*] > 5' ;
> ?column?
> ----------
> t
> (1 row)

Just for the sake of clarity, this return value is “correct,” because @? and other functions and operators that expect SQL standard statements evaluate the SET returned by the JSONPath statement, but predicate check expressions don’t return a set, but a always a single scalar value (true, false, or null). From the POV of the code expecting SQL standard JSONPath results, that’s a set of one. @? sees that the set is not empty so returns true.

Best,

David

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2024-01-21 19:34:19 Re: Patch: Improve Boolean Predicate JSON Path Docs
Previous Message Jeff Davis 2024-01-21 19:07:15 Re: [17] CREATE COLLATION default provider