From: | Michael Glaesemann <grzm(at)seespotcode(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Tim Uckun <timuckun(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-general <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Deleting orphaned records (not exists is very slow) |
Date: | 2010-09-27 23:23:42 |
Message-ID: | FAA3A014-09A0-40B6-BB9F-BD4F171F96CB@seespotcode.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Sep 27, 2010, at 8:02 , Tim Uckun wrote:
> What is the best strategy for deleting orphaned records from a large table.
>
> The usual NOT IN is very slow so there must be a better way in
> postgres for dealing with these.
If the table is large, I sometimes use the following pattern:
1. Create a trigger on the referenced table (foo) to delete rows from the
referencing table (bar) when they're deleted from the referenced table.
This is a poor man's ON DELETE CASCADE and prevents any more rows from being
orphaned.
2. Create a table with the keys of the referencing table which are no longer
in the referenced table:
CREATE TABLE orphaned_bar
SELECT keycol
FROM bar
LEFT JOIN foo USING (keycol)
WHERE foo.keycol IS NULL;
keycol may be multiple columns if you've got a multi-column key.
3. You're then free to delete the rows from bar however you wish, using orphaned_bar.
You might want to do them in one go, or in batches. You'll likely want to create an
index on orphaned_bar.keycol.
You can then add your foreign key and get rid of the trigger on foo when you're done.
Hope this helps.
Michael Glaesemann
grzm seespotcode net
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Satoshi Nagayasu | 2010-09-27 23:29:36 | Re: ECPG - Some errno definitions don't match to the manual |
Previous Message | David Boreham | 2010-09-27 23:13:52 | Re: zero_damaged_pages doesn't work |