| From: | Perry Smith <pedz(at)easesoftware(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Michael Glaesemann <grzm(at)seespotcode(dot)net>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: pg_dump of only the structure from a client such as ruby |
| Date: | 2007-08-06 01:32:57 |
| Message-ID: | FA945A56-903A-4818-B188-8A0D6CED7B92@easesoftware.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Aug 5, 2007, at 7:37 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Perry Smith <pedz(at)easesoftware(dot)com> writes:
>> I find it odd that you are resistant to the idea. To me, the
>> advantages are clear if it can be done without a tremendous amount of
>> work.
>
> Well, it can't. pg_dump is an enormously complicated and frequently
> changed bit of code, and so you really really don't want to be copying
> it into other clients.
<snip>
Thanks for the reply.
> PS: *please* see if you can get them to take out the usage of
> pg_dump's
> -i switch. Having code invoke that blindly borders on criminal
> negligence.
I'll open a bug report and submit a patch... Thats the most I can do.
Perry Smith ( pedz(at)easesoftware(dot)com )
Ease Software, Inc. ( http://www.easesoftware.com )
Low cost SATA Disk Systems for IBMs p5, pSeries, and RS/6000 AIX systems
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Perry Smith | 2007-08-06 01:53:46 | Re: pg_dump of only the structure from a client such as ruby |
| Previous Message | hanasaki | 2007-08-06 01:29:53 | Re: HA, failover and load balancing / howto? |