From: | "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
Cc: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Feature freeze progress report |
Date: | 2007-05-03 18:20:16 |
Message-ID: | FA1FCD31735E16AEEC79AA3F@ganymede.hub.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-www |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Why not just send a notice out stated that Gborg will be shutdown as of June
1st ... give a finite deadline to move things over to pgfoundry ... just
because we 'shut down' the site on June 1st, it doesn't mean we are going to
wipe it all out, we can just put a Redirect on the web server on gborg over to
pgfoundry so that ppl can't go *to* gborg's web site ... we can also make the
CVS 'read-only', so that developers can't update the CVS there, but ppl can
still download the code ...
- --On Thursday, May 03, 2007 10:47:48 -0700 "Joshua D. Drake"
<jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> wrote:
> Josh Berkus wrote:
>> Bruce,
>>
>>> Get rid of gborg and let's talk.
>>
>> Touche'.
>>
>> Actually, AFAICT, the only active thing left on GBorg is WWW. If we move
>> that, we can shut it down. Any objections?
>
> This should be a different thread *but* to my knowledge there is more than
> WWW active on Gborg. Or at least there is some data that people still wished
> moved.
>
> Gborg needs to be shutdown in a scheduled manner. I proposed a schedule last
> year but it was largely overlooked:
>
> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-general/2006-08/msg01167.php
>
> My rather bold attempt to reach all people associated with Gborg was not met
> with positive responses either (granted due to a mistake on my end).
>
> http://people.planetpostgresql.org/joshua/index.php?/archives/15-Blacklisting
> -PostgreSQL.Org,-Spam-and-hordes-of-geeks-Oh-My!.html
>
>>
>>> Why am I having to spend hours in Syndey saying the same thing? Why
>>> don't you guys go ahead and change things, and when they fail, I will
>>> still be around.
>>
>> You're acting as a majority of one, here, Bruce. The reason why any
>> solution anyone else tries *will* fail is because you will refuse to
>> participate in it. That's why people are trying to persuade you instead of
>> just going ahead and doing it; you have the power to effectively sandbag
>> anything anyone else does, so that's why nobody wants to put effort into it
>> if you're opposed.
>
>
> That pretty much sums it up. Bruce you can either come to the party with a
> smile or a grin. It is your party. If you come with a smile everyone will be
> a lot happier.
>
>
> Sincerely,
>
> Joshua D. Drake
>
>
>
> --
>
> === The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
> Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
> Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1997
> http://www.commandprompt.com/
>
> Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
> PostgreSQL Replication: http://www.commandprompt.com/products/
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to
> choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not
> match
- ----
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email . scrappy(at)hub(dot)org MSN . scrappy(at)hub(dot)org
Yahoo . yscrappy Skype: hub.org ICQ . 7615664
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (FreeBSD)
iD8DBQFGOifh4QvfyHIvDvMRAvKSAJ9l87k9s8wp4nnw5W4xyCQJIgwNOQCeMLXt
bOqtGrCOZ8WnbrhAdYKOGKY=
=vJmp
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Neil Conway | 2007-05-03 18:20:19 | Re: row-level stats and last analyze time |
Previous Message | Jeff Davis | 2007-05-03 18:04:11 | Re: Sequential scans |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Chris Ryan | 2007-05-03 19:12:20 | Re: [HACKERS] Feature freeze progress report |
Previous Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2007-05-03 17:47:48 | Re: [HACKERS] Feature freeze progress report |