Re: Cutting support for OpenSSL 1.0.1 and 1.0.2 in 17~?

From: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>
To: Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Jacob Champion <jacob(dot)champion(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Mikael Kjellström <mikael(dot)kjellstrom(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Cutting support for OpenSSL 1.0.1 and 1.0.2 in 17~?
Date: 2024-08-07 13:49:37
Message-ID: F98E346F-ED9C-4E66-90C6-21BB02E78897@yesql.se
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> On 5 Aug 2024, at 15:36, Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com> wrote:

> It would not shock me to see complaints from others after we rip out support
> for 1.0.2, but maybe not ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

I think it's highly likely that we will see complaints for any support we
deprecate. OpenSSL 1.0.2 will however still be supported for another 5 years
with v17 (which is ~9years past its EOL date) so I don't feel too bad about it.

--
Daniel Gustafsson

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Fujii Masao 2024-08-07 13:54:40 Re: Support specify tablespace for each merged/split partition
Previous Message Joe Conway 2024-08-07 13:42:32 Re: Remaining dependency on setlocale()