Re: Some deleted GUCs are still referred to

From: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>
To: Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Some deleted GUCs are still referred to
Date: 2023-11-09 09:12:03
Message-ID: F98636D2-B4C4-4CE8-8EA6-E29CFA544CB4@yesql.se
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-translators

> On 9 Nov 2023, at 00:51, Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I happened to notice that some GUC names "max_fsm_pages" and
> "max_fsm_relations" are still mentioned in these translation files
> (from the REL_16_1 source zip)
>
> src\backend\po\fr.po
> src\backend\po\tr.po
>
> ~~
>
> Should those be removed?

These mentions are only in comments and not in actual translations, so I don't
think they risk causing any issues.

$ git grep max_fsm_ |cut -d":" -f 2 |grep -v "^#" | wc -l
0

I don't know enough about the translation workflow to know how these comments
are handled, sending this to pgsql-translators@ might be a better way to reach
the authors working on this.

> There was a commit [1] that said these all traces of those GUCs had
> been eliminated.

Translations are managed in an external repo and synced with the main repo at
intervals, so such a commit couldn't have updated the master translation work
files anyways.

--
Daniel Gustafsson

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Nazir Bilal Yavuz 2023-11-09 09:35:46 Re: Show WAL write and fsync stats in pg_stat_io
Previous Message Shlok Kyal 2023-11-09 08:59:39 Failure during Building Postgres in Windows with Meson

Browse pgsql-translators by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Smith 2023-11-13 23:32:16 Re: Some deleted GUCs are still referred to
Previous Message Peter Smith 2023-11-08 23:51:06 Some deleted GUCs are still referred to