Re: 011_crash_recovery.pl intermittently fails

From: Andrey Borodin <x4mmm(at)yandex-team(dot)ru>
To: Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Craig Ringer <craig(dot)ringer(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com
Subject: Re: 011_crash_recovery.pl intermittently fails
Date: 2021-03-05 08:20:53
Message-ID: F9794815-CD6B-4971-89C9-68EBBB92E9BC@yandex-team.ru
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> 5 марта 2021 г., в 13:00, Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com> написал(а):
>
> The problem records have 15 pages of FPIs. The reduction of their
> size may prevent WAL-buffer wrap around and wal writes. If no wal is
> written the test fails.
Thanks, I've finally understood the root cause.
So, test verifies guarantee that is not provided (durability of aborted transactions)?
Maybe flip it to test that transaction effects are not committed\visible?

Best regards, Andrey Borodin.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kyotaro Horiguchi 2021-03-05 08:37:22 Re: 011_crash_recovery.pl failes using wal_block_size=16K
Previous Message Thomas Kellerer 2021-03-05 08:19:21 Re: Which PG version does CVE-2021-20229 affected?