Re: BUG #15299: relation does not exist errors

From: Jeff Frost <jeff(at)pgexperts(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: BUG #15299: relation does not exist errors
Date: 2018-07-26 19:05:55
Message-ID: F8F8913D-3491-471A-A9D6-4C36CE9F786D@pgexperts.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs

> On Jul 26, 2018, at 9:50 AM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>
> =?utf-8?q?PG_Bug_reporting_form?= <noreply(at)postgresql(dot)org> writes:
>> We recently upgraded some production servers to 9.5.13 on Saturday
>> (7/21/2018) and they ran fine for 2 days. On Wednesday morning, we started
>> seeing some strange issues where postgres was reporting tons of "relation"
>> does not exist errors. Here are some snippets from the logs:
>
>> 2018-07-25 14:33:53.243
>> GMT,"app_db","webapp",34887,"127.0.0.1:56740",5b587d3b.8847,90363,"PARSE",2018-07-25
>> 13:38:03 GMT,287/3021104,0,ERROR,42P01,"relation ""login_informations"" does
>> not exist",,,
>> ,,,"SELECT ""login_informations"".* FROM ""login_informations"" WHERE
>> ""login_informations"".""id"" = 735211 LIMIT 1",37,,"sidekiq 4.1.2 procore
>> [0 of 5 busy]"
>
>> Connecting to the DB via psql and issuing a \d login_informations showed
>> that the table was there. Running one of the queries from the logs by hand
>> worked fine.
>
> My first thought would be something to do with a restrictive search_path.

Good thought. As far as I can tell we never change it from the default and everything in that DB is in the public schema.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2018-07-26 19:14:35 Re: BUG #15299: relation does not exist errors
Previous Message Tom Lane 2018-07-26 18:47:20 Re: BUG #15300: "do you want the application "postgres" to accept incoming network connections" dialog box madness