Re: Snapshot too old logging

From: Brad DeJong <Brad(dot)Dejong(at)infor(dot)com>
To: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Snapshot too old logging
Date: 2016-11-18 16:49:39
Message-ID: F8F0ED16CB59F247B7EFD0E1DB34BC1F5CB57BD8@USALWEXMBX3.infor.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 6:43 AM, Robert Haas wrote:
> I think I was suggesting: One or more rows required by this query may
> already have been removed from "%s".

I keep reading that as "you have data corruption because something removed rows that your query needs" rather than "this query took too long to complete but may succeed if you resubmit it".

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2016-11-18 17:00:12 Re: [RFC] Should we fix postmaster to avoid slow shutdown?
Previous Message Robert Haas 2016-11-18 16:39:55 Re: Declarative partitioning - another take