From: | Brad DeJong <Brad(dot)Dejong(at)infor(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Dave Cramer <pg(at)fastcrypt(dot)com>, Thomas Kellerer <spam_eater(at)gmx(dot)net> |
Cc: | List <pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Re: JDBC and the hstore ? operator - no longer working with build 1211 |
Date: | 2016-11-02 15:18:25 |
Message-ID: | F8F0ED16CB59F247B7EFD0E1DB34BC1F5CB542BD@USALWEXMBX3.infor.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-jdbc |
On 2 November 2016 at 06:03, Dave Cramer wrote:
> On 2 November 2016 at 03:56, Thomas Kellerer <spam_eater(at)gmx(dot)net<mailto:spam_eater(at)gmx(dot)net>> wrote:
>> Jorge Solórzano schrieb am 01.11.2016 um 23:47:
>>>> But that JAR file is missing the META-INF/services directory.
>>>> I don't know if that is due to it being a snapshot or if that is a general problem with the build system.
>>>
>>> Thomas, can you please check the latest 9.4.1212-SNAPSHOT? (postgresql-9.4.1212-20161101.224154-17.jar)
>>
>> Looks good.
>>
>> I don't need Class.forName() any more with that version.
>
> I don't believe that has been required for quite some time ?
The implication is that he had to add a call to Class.forName() in order to test the snapshot jar where the META-INF/services directory was missing. Now that the META-INF/services/java.sql.Driver file is back, the service provider framework knows how to load the driver and so he does not need to call Class.forName() anymore.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Vladimir Sitnikov | 2016-11-02 17:56:47 | pgjdbc 9.4.1212 is released |
Previous Message | Thomas Kellerer | 2016-11-02 11:21:59 | Re: JDBC and the hstore ? operator - no longer working with build 1211 |