Re: postgresql vs mysql

From: "Brandon Aiken" <BAiken(at)winemantech(dot)com>
To: <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: postgresql vs mysql
Date: 2007-02-22 23:48:29
Message-ID: F8E84F0F56445B4CB39E019EF67DACBA48C05B@exchsrvr.winemantech.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Digg and Slashdot use MySQL databases, so clearly they *can* be made to
support a high-load, high-performance, limited-write style web
application.

You might remember a few months back when SlashDot had to turn off
threaded replies because the schema for the parent-child field was still
an UNSIGNED INT4 instead of an UNSIGNED INT8, and they reached the
maximum value of the field (16.7 million). Obviously, I have no
knowledge of the server configuration, hardware configuration, or
schema, but in-the-wild examples of high performance MySQL installations
are trivial to find (as are PostgreSQL installations such as the .org
DNS TLD root).

I'd like to see a tuned MySQL vs a similarly tuned PostgreSQL system
(that is, fsync in the same state and with the same level of ACID
compliance) subject to a battery of test schema types (OLTP, OLAP,
etc.).

--
Brandon Aiken
CS/IT Systems Engineer

-----Original Message-----
From: Jim Nasby [mailto:decibel(at)decibel(dot)org]
Sent: Thursday, February 22, 2007 6:28 PM
To: Brandon Aiken
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] postgresql vs mysql

On Feb 21, 2007, at 2:23 PM, Brandon Aiken wrote:
> IMX, the only things going for MySQL are:
> 1. It's fast.

That depends greatly on what you're doing with it. Generally, as soon
as you start throwing a multi-user workload at it, MySQL stops
scaling. http://tweakers.net recently did a study on that.
--
Jim Nasby jim(at)nasby(dot)net
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com 512.569.9461 (cell)

--------------------------------------------------------------------
** LEGAL DISCLAIMER **
Statements made in this e-mail may or may not reflect the views and
opinions of Wineman Technology, Inc. or its employees.

This e-mail message and any attachments may contain legally privileged,
confidential or proprietary information. If you are not the intended
recipient(s), or the employee or agent responsible for delivery of
this message to the intended recipient(s), you are hereby notified
that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this e-mail
message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in
error, please immediately notify the sender and delete this e-mail
message from your computer.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Scott Marlowe 2007-02-23 00:08:28 Re: postgresql vs mysql
Previous Message Ron Johnson 2007-02-22 23:46:42 Re: postgresql vs mysql