Re: 8.2 is 30% better in pgbench than 8.3

From: Jim Nasby <decibel(at)decibel(dot)org>
To: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Pavel Stehule" <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, "PostgreSQL-development" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: 8.2 is 30% better in pgbench than 8.3
Date: 2007-07-23 16:52:21
Message-ID: F8CB13CC-2DC0-42A3-8E91-A6317F457737@decibel.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Jul 23, 2007, at 1:40 AM, Simon Riggs wrote:
> Potential solution: Each autovac worker gets a range of table sizes
> they
> are allowed to VACUUM.

Anyone putting thought into this should check the archives; there was
quite a bit of discussion around it. For 8.3 we decided to KISS so
that we'd get in the release, but we really do need to tackle the
starvation issue for 8.4.
--
Jim Nasby jim(at)nasby(dot)net
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com 512.569.9461 (cell)

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Magnus Hagander 2007-07-23 16:59:19 Re: Oops in fe-auth.c
Previous Message Jim Nasby 2007-07-23 16:49:34 Re: 8.2 is 30% better in pgbench than 8.3