Re: Detailed release notes

From: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>
To: Marcos Pegoraro <marcos(at)f10(dot)com(dot)br>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Detailed release notes
Date: 2024-07-26 12:45:20
Message-ID: F8C2CC64-5265-4668-901D-B4A20420EC89@yesql.se
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> On 26 Jul 2024, at 14:30, Marcos Pegoraro <marcos(at)f10(dot)com(dot)br> wrote:
>
> I'm now using version 14 and planning to update to 17 as soon as it comes available. Then looking carefully to release notes to see exactly what I'll get when updated I see lots of unexplained features. Just because release notes does not explain exactly what that change does. And I don't have a way to get what code or messages generated that feature.

There is a way, but it's not exactly visible from reading the release notes.

> • Allow query nodes to be run in parallel in more cases (Tom Lane)
> Cool this feature, but when and what kind of query will use this ?

Reading the source of the release notes will show a comment which links to the
commit. The source can be seen here:

https://github.com/postgres/postgres/blob/REL_17_STABLE/doc/src/sgml/release-17.sgml

..and the comment for this item is:

<!--
Author: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
2023-07-14 [e08d74ca1] Allow plan nodes with initPlans to be considered paralle
-->

<listitem>
<para>
Allow query nodes to be run in parallel in more cases (Tom Lane)
</para>
</listitem>

This comment tells us the relevant commit is e08d74ca1, which can be found here:

https://github.com/postgres/postgres/commit/e08d74ca1

This in turn leads to the mailinglist discussion for this specific feature:

https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/1129530.1681317832@sss.pgh.pa.us

--
Daniel Gustafsson

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Marina Polyakova 2024-07-26 12:47:01 Re: tls 1.3: sending multiple tickets
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2024-07-26 12:41:05 Re: fairywren timeout failures on the pg_amcheck/005_opclass_damage test