| From: | Guido Neitzer <lists(at)event-s(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Postgresql General <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Multi DB performance test |
| Date: | 2007-03-13 05:02:19 |
| Message-ID: | F7703198-93B5-4530-84D6-0F5AB4446DFD@event-s.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On 12.03.2007, at 22:46, Tom Lane wrote:
> Most of us stopped reading about the place where they explained
> that (a) they did zero tuning on each database, and (b) they were
> comparing myisam to transactional engines.
What I don't like about things like that, is that some morons throw
something together they call a "performance test", add some colorful
graphs to it and it will be quoted for the next ten years, "decision
makers" will base their recommendations on it and a lot of followers
will just believe.
Whether or not this applies to the referenced test - judge yourself.
cug
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Dmitry Koterov | 2007-03-13 07:37:39 | Incorrect "ERROR: database "xxx" is being accessed by other users" |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2007-03-13 04:46:26 | Re: Multi DB performance test |