Re: Document DateStyle effect on jsonpath string()

From: "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)justatheory(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>, jian he <jian(dot)universality(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Document DateStyle effect on jsonpath string()
Date: 2024-09-11 19:52:26
Message-ID: F6E09873-F161-4AE2-B03A-08EFF8F0EF24@justatheory.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sep 11, 2024, at 15:43, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:

> Seems to me it should be the jsonpath convention. If the spec
> does require any specific spelling, surely it must be that one.

WFM, though now I’ll have to go change my port 😂.

D

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2024-09-11 19:55:10 Re: Accept invalidation messages before the query starts inside a transaction
Previous Message Andrei Lepikhov 2024-09-11 19:50:44 Accept invalidation messages before the query starts inside a transaction