Re: citext like searches using index

From: "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)kineticode(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Thorbjørn Weidemann <thorbjoern(at)weidemann(dot)name>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org Hackers" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: citext like searches using index
Date: 2013-04-02 15:59:49
Message-ID: F6D40F9D-1F61-4B5E-B8FE-9BD670700A62@kineticode.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Apr 2, 2013, at 8:03 AM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:

>> Are there any widely known non-built-in cases besides citext?
>
> Well, indxpath.c knows about text LIKE and network subset operators,
> and it would be nice if it knew how to do the same type of optimization
> for range inclusion, ie btree_indexed_col <@ range_constant. The latter
> doesn't seem implementable in the current infrastructure because ranges
> aren't all built-in types. I agree that the citext case isn't too
> compelling in isolation, but surely the range case is interesting.

Is this knowledge encapsulated in a to-do?

David

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jeff Janes 2013-04-02 16:01:36 Re: Spin Lock sleep resolution
Previous Message Robert Haas 2013-04-02 15:54:32 Re: Page replacement algorithm in buffer cache