From: | Michael Glaesemann <grzm(at)myrealbox(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Michael Schmidt <MichaelMSchmidt(at)msn(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-general <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Check constraint problem |
Date: | 2005-07-01 03:46:02 |
Message-ID: | F69EA51E-7A49-4916-9F19-A170E4C6387F@myrealbox.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Jul 1, 2005, at 12:04 PM, Michael Schmidt wrote:
> The constraint statement:
>
> ALTER TABLE "ClinData" ADD CONSTRAINT "Control_Score" CHECK
> ((("Control_Score_M" IS NULL) AND ("Control_Score_SD" IS NULL) ) OR
> (("Control_Score_M" IS NOT NULL) AND ("Control_Score_SD" >= 0.0)))
>
> This statement executes okay. It prevents Control_Score_M of NULL
> and Control_Score_SD = 1.0 (as it should). However, it allows
> Control_Score_M = 1 and Control_Score_SD of NULL (it shouldn't).
> Any thoughts about what is wrong. Thanks!
I think the problem may be that Control_Score_SD >= 0.0 is evaluated
in interesting ways when Control_Score_SD is NULL. What happens if
you do this?
ALTER TABLE "ClinData" ADD CONSTRAINT "Control_Score"
CHECK (
( ("Control_Score_M" IS NULL)
AND ("Control_Score_SD" IS NULL) )
OR ( ("Control_Score_M" IS NOT NULL)
AND ("Control_Score_SD" IS NOT NULL)
AND ("Control_Score_SD" >= 0.0) )
);
You can probably drop the innermost parens, I believe. Might improve
legibility
ALTER TABLE "ClinData" ADD CONSTRAINT "Control_Score"
CHECK (
( "Control_Score_M" IS NULL
AND "Control_Score_SD" IS NULL )
OR ( "Control_Score_M" IS NOT NULL
AND "Control_Score_SD" IS NOT NULL
AND "Control_Score_SD" >= 0.0 )
);
Does this help?
Michael Glaesemann
grzm myrealbox com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Christopher Kings-Lynne | 2005-07-01 04:12:09 | Re: [ANNOUNCE] Language to use with SQL database - Number |
Previous Message | Marc G. Fournier | 2005-07-01 03:33:55 | Re: [ANNOUNCE] Language to use with SQL database - Number ONE computer |