Re: Performances with new Intel Core* processors

From: Vivek Khera <vivek(at)khera(dot)org>
To: "Pgsql-Performance ((E-mail))" <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Performances with new Intel Core* processors
Date: 2006-07-31 21:04:37
Message-ID: F691538B-0888-4546-9AFF-63FB1255083A@khera.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance


On Jul 31, 2006, at 12:30 PM, Arjen van der Meijden wrote:

> For a database system, however, processors hardly ever are the main
> bottleneck, are they? So you should probably go for a set of "fast
> processors" from your favorite supplier and focus mainly on lots of
> memory and fast disks. Whether that employs Opterons or Xeon
> Woodcrest (no other Xeons are up to that

No, but it *does* matter how fast said processor can sling the memory
around, and in my experience, the opterons have been much better at
that due to the efficiency of the memory transport layer.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Luke Lonergan 2006-08-01 04:26:57 Re: Performances with new Intel Core* processors
Previous Message Scott Marlowe 2006-07-31 20:27:45 Re: Performances with new Intel Core* processors