From: | "Larry Rosenman" <lrosenman(at)pervasive(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "Bruce Momjian" <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | "Casey Duncan" <casey(at)pandora(dot)com>, <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "Alvaro Herrera" <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: autovacuum "connections" are hidden |
Date: | 2006-05-18 17:04:26 |
Message-ID: | F6616E0E81AC0841B1F9DD252F7C4B55041A83@ausmaildd.aus.pervasive.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> Casey Duncan <casey(at)pandora(dot)com> writes:
>>> however, when I did "select * from pg_stat_activity" on the pg
>>> server, it showed no connection to that db. Then I looked at the
>>> processes: tmp0% ps ax | grep test_seg1
>>> 10317 ? D 0:36 postgres: autovacuum process test_seg1
>>
>> Hmm, autovacuum won't show up in pg_stat_activity because it never
>> calls pgstat_report_activity(). Seems like maybe it should, though.
>
> If we do that, would it help people who are trying to determine if
> pg_autovacuum is running? Would the connection still appear while
> pg_autovacuum is sleeping?
I believe while autovacuum is sleeping, the process is gone.
I.e. it gets spawned anew for each pass looking for work.
--
Larry Rosenman
Database Support Engineer
PERVASIVE SOFTWARE. INC.
12365B RIATA TRACE PKWY
3015
AUSTIN TX 78727-6531
Tel: 512.231.6173
Fax: 512.231.6597
Email: Larry(dot)Rosenman(at)pervasive(dot)com
Web: www.pervasive.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2006-05-18 17:05:58 | Re: autovacuum "connections" are hidden |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2006-05-18 16:45:06 | Re: autovacuum "connections" are hidden |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2006-05-18 17:05:58 | Re: autovacuum "connections" are hidden |
Previous Message | John DeSoi | 2006-05-18 16:48:47 | Re: [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS bad? |