From: | "Larry Rosenman" <lrosenman(at)pervasive(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "Larry Rosenman" <lrosenman(at)pervasive(dot)com>, "Simon Riggs" <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | "Bruce Momjian" <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Matthew T(dot) O'Connor" <matthew(at)zeut(dot)net>, "PostgreSQL-development" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Logging pg_autovacuum |
Date: | 2006-04-28 16:09:40 |
Message-ID: | F6616E0E81AC0841B1F9DD252F7C4B55041A3F@ausmaildd.aus.pervasive.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Larry Rosenman wrote:
> Simon Riggs wrote:
>> On Thu, 2006-04-27 at 14:53 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>>> "Larry Rosenman" <lrosenman(at)pervasive(dot)com> writes:
>>>> I'd like to see a more concrete definition of what we
>>>> want Autovacuum to output and at what levels.
>>>
>>> autovacuum_verbosity
>>
>> Should we call it autovacuum_messages?
>>
>> In current usage...
>>
>> _verbosity controls how much information each message gives
>> _messages controls what types of messages are logged
>
> That probably works, but I'm not sure about the one to add the VERBOSE
> to the
> VACUUM commands autovacuum.c emits.
does the following options satisfy everyone:
autovacuum_messages=
none silent (nothing output at LOG level)
database we'd output a LOG message processing database <name>
table we'd output a LOG message for each table we actually vacuum /
analyze
verbose we'd add the verbose flag to each command
the lower levels would include the upper (I.E. verbose implies table +
database).
If this is acceptable, I'm going to start working on the code to
implement it.
LER
--
Larry Rosenman
Database Support Engineer
PERVASIVE SOFTWARE. INC.
12365B RIATA TRACE PKWY
3015
AUSTIN TX 78727-6531
Tel: 512.231.6173
Fax: 512.231.6597
Email: Larry(dot)Rosenman(at)pervasive(dot)com
Web: www.pervasive.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Teodor Sigaev | 2006-04-28 16:11:26 | Re: GIN - Generalized Inverted iNdex. Try 3. |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2006-04-28 15:53:05 | Re: GIN - Generalized Inverted iNdex. Try 3. |