Re: anyelement -> anyrange

From: "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)justatheory(dot)com>
To: Jim Nasby <Jim(dot)Nasby(at)BlueTreble(dot)com>
Cc: Corey Huinker <corey(dot)huinker(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>
Subject: Re: anyelement -> anyrange
Date: 2016-08-18 19:51:09
Message-ID: F65A9A62-7534-4276-B062-EE8B8F9F477F@justatheory.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Aug 18, 2016, at 11:49 AM, Jim Nasby <Jim(dot)Nasby(at)BlueTreble(dot)com> wrote:

> Well crap, I searched for range stuff on PGXN before creating http://pgxn.org/dist/range_tools/ and the only thing that came up was your range_partitioning stuff, which AFAICT is unrelated. http://pgxn.org/dist/range_type_functions/still doesn't show up in search, maybe because it's marked unstable?

Yep. https://github.com/pgxn/pgxn-api/issues/2

David

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2016-08-18 19:52:49 Re: WIP: About CMake v2
Previous Message Christian Convey 2016-08-18 19:42:18 Re: WIP: About CMake v2