From: | Vivek Khera <vivek(at)khera(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql general list <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: BIG installations of PostgresQL? |
Date: | 2005-09-20 14:13:12 |
Message-ID: | F53574E3-6A43-4360-A2B1-C06D0F4C318A@khera.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Sep 15, 2005, at 11:25 PM, Logan Bowers wrote:
> Many of the other folks at the company feel an open-source DB is
> more risky because it is less well tested compared to commercial
> counterparts. I’m looking for examples of large installations of
> Postgres with huge data sets, high traffic volumes, high update
> rates, etc, particularly large, recognizable names. I know you
> guys get this question a lot, but can anyone share experiences with
> using Postgres in large settings with huge query rates,
> replication, etc? Any stories you guys can share (in public or
> private) would be greatly appreciated. Thanks in advance!
Every so often on the slony (Postgres replication) list, a fellow
from Skype pops up. I suspect they use postgres under high volume,
huge dataset situation...
Also, do a "whois slony.info" or any *.info domain and you hit a
replicated postgres database. The entire .info (and now .org) domain
registries are stored on postgres.
Vivek Khera, Ph.D.
+1-301-869-4449 x806
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Scott Ribe | 2005-09-20 14:21:13 | Re: Replication |
Previous Message | Vivek Khera | 2005-09-20 14:06:30 | Re: Problem with 64-bit Postgres |