From: | "Benjamin Krajmalnik" <kraj(at)illumen(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "Kevin Grittner" <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>, <pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Autovacuum stopped running |
Date: | 2010-05-01 17:15:53 |
Message-ID: | F4E6A2751A2823418A21D4A160B6898861435F@fletch.stackdump.local |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-admin |
TO be truthful, I did not check that.
I arrived at the conclusion because although I have 10 autovacuum
threads, none of the tables had been autoanalyzed or autovacuumed in
hours (and due to the nature of the activity they do so every minute).
If I ever see this behavior now I know what to check for :) Thx.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Kevin Grittner [mailto:Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov]
> Sent: Saturday, May 01, 2010 8:27 AM
> To: Benjamin Krajmalnik; pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org
> Subject: Re: [ADMIN] Autovacuum stopped running
>
> "Benjamin Krajmalnik" <kraj(at)illumen(dot)com> wrote:
> > I had a very strange occurrence 2 days ago where autovacuum
> > appears to have stopped running.
>
> What did you see which led you to that conclusion? Did ps show the
> 'autovacuum launcher process'?
>
> > I did not see any error messages in pg_log. The problem caused a
> > file which is usually around 50Mb but which gets updated
> > extensively to grow to 105GB, which in turn brought the server's
> > performance down to unusable levels.
>
> Were there any long-running transactions showing in
> pg_stat_activity? (That would include transactions showing '<IDLE>
> in transaction'.)
>
> -Kevin
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2010-05-01 22:52:19 | Re: Fresh build on OS X not working (memory) |
Previous Message | Enrico Weigelt | 2010-05-01 16:51:13 | Re: linux standard layout |