From: | "Igor Neyman" <ineyman(at)perceptron(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "rverghese" <riyav(at)hotmail(dot)com>, <pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Concurrent Reindex on Primary Key for large table |
Date: | 2012-02-10 14:41:38 |
Message-ID: | F4C27E77F7A33E4CA98C19A9DC6722A208BEA92B@EXCHANGE.corp.perceptron.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-sql |
> -----Original Message-----
> From: rverghese [mailto:riyav(at)hotmail(dot)com]
> Sent: Thursday, February 09, 2012 12:49 PM
> To: pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org
> Subject: Re: Concurrent Reindex on Primary Key for large table
>
> Thanks! That worked.
>
> Any thoughts about containing index bloat. I thought the autovac would
> clean it up a bit more. Would any tweaks to my settings improve
autovac
> performance? I am still doing a couple of concurrent reindexes per
week
> otherwise performance degrades over a couple of days.
>
> Thanks
> RV
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://postgresql.1045698.n5.nabble.com/Concurrent-Reindex-on-Primary-
> Key-for-large-table-tp5467243p5470216.html
> Sent from the PostgreSQL - sql mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Did you try to make autovacuum "more aggressive" like lowering
autovacuum_vacuum_threshold from 20000?
Regards,
Igor Neyman
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Oliveiros d'Azevedo Cristina | 2012-02-10 15:33:09 | Re: update column |
Previous Message | rverghese | 2012-02-09 17:48:53 | Re: Concurrent Reindex on Primary Key for large table |