Re: [Slony1-general] Using slony with many schema's

From: Vivek Khera <vivek(at)khera(dot)org>
To: PostgreSQL general <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [Slony1-general] Using slony with many schema's
Date: 2006-10-11 21:03:36
Message-ID: F40BEA6D-12A3-4100-B554-1FEA9C744FA5@khera.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general


On Oct 11, 2006, at 2:55 PM, snacktime wrote:

> So by putting all the data into one schema, every report query now
> gets run against a million or more rows instead of just a few hundred
> or thousand. So all clients will see a drop in query performance
> instead of just the clients with large amounts of data.

Indexes on the customer_id field of the combined data tables helps a
lot. That and big hardware with big RAM. :-)

We store data for all our customers in the same tables. some have
several hundred thousand of their own customers, and millions of
transactions from them; others have a few hundred. The
responsiveness of postgres is still great.

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ludwig Kniprath 2006-10-11 21:04:29 Re: Problem compiling PostGIS 1.1.4
Previous Message Jeff Davis 2006-10-11 21:02:08 Re: Is it possible to return custom type as proper ROW?