From: | Erik Jones <erik(at)myemma(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Mike Blackwell <maiku41(at)sbcglobal(dot)net> |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Using meta-data for foreign key? |
Date: | 2008-04-17 16:14:57 |
Message-ID: | F3BD08A6-13C8-49DB-8CF3-A81981361B8A@myemma.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Apr 17, 2008, at 10:23 AM, Mike Blackwell wrote:
> I have an existing table in an app, along the lines of:
>
> CREATE TABLE foo (
> name text,
> address text,
> some_numeric_info integer,
> <a bunch of additional fields here>
> );
>
> I now need to be able to associate additional information (e.g.
> printing
> order) with each field. Is it a bad idea to use the (fully qualified)
> field name as a foreign key to link back to the table meta-data? Is
> there a better way?
You're going to have to be *much* more specific about what you're
trying to do/talk about. A complete example would be best.
Erik Jones
DBA | Emma®
erik(at)myemma(dot)com
800.595.4401 or 615.292.5888
615.292.0777 (fax)
Emma helps organizations everywhere communicate & market in style.
Visit us online at http://www.myemma.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Mike Blackwell | 2008-04-17 16:32:28 | Re: Using meta-data for foreign key? |
Previous Message | Ottavio Campana | 2008-04-17 16:04:50 | problem with tsearch and utf-8 on postgresql 8.1 |