From: | "Bossart, Nathan" <bossartn(at)amazon(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Amul Sul <sulamul(at)gmail(dot)com>, Jaime Casanova <jcasanov(at)systemguards(dot)com(dot)ec>, Rushabh Lathia <rushabh(dot)lathia(at)gmail(dot)com>, Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Bharath Rupireddy <bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com>, Ibrar Ahmed <ibrar(dot)ahmad(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Prabhat Sahu <prabhat(dot)sahu(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: [Patch] ALTER SYSTEM READ ONLY |
Date: | 2021-10-25 20:35:28 |
Message-ID: | F3087976-5215-48B8-87A0-A74E563CECE7@amazon.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 10/25/21, 1:33 PM, "Robert Haas" <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 25, 2021 at 3:14 PM Bossart, Nathan <bossartn(at)amazon(dot)com> wrote:
>> My compiler is complaining about oldXLogAllowed possibly being used
>> uninitialized in CreateCheckPoint(). AFAICT it can just be initially
>> set to zero to silence this warning because it will, in fact, be
>> initialized properly when it is used.
>
> Hmm, I guess I could have foreseen that, had I been a little bit
> smarter than I am. I have committed a change to initialize it to 0 as
> you propose.
Thanks!
Nathan
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bossart, Nathan | 2021-10-25 20:38:44 | Re: parallelizing the archiver |
Previous Message | Yura Sokolov | 2021-10-25 20:32:43 | Re: XTS cipher mode for cluster file encryption |