From: | "Shea,Dan [CIS]" <Dan(dot)Shea(at)ec(dot)gc(dot)ca> |
---|---|
To: | 'Josh Berkus' <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Why will vacuum not end? |
Date: | 2004-04-24 14:45:40 |
Message-ID: | F2D63B916C88C14D9B59F93C2A5DD33F0B924F@cisxa.cmc.int.ec.gc.ca |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
Josh, how long should a vacuum take on a 87 GB table with a 39 GB index?
I do not think that the verbose option of vacuum is verbose enough.
The vacuum keeps redoing the index, but there is no indication as to why it
is doing this.
I see alot of activity with transaction logs being recycled (15 to 30 every
3 to 20 minutes).
Is the vacuum causing this?
-----Original Message-----
From: Josh Berkus [mailto:josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com]
Sent: Friday, April 23, 2004 2:48 PM
To: Shea,Dan [CIS]; 'Christopher Kings-Lynne'
Cc: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [PERFORM] Why will vacuum not end?
Guys,
> Well, inserts create some locks - perhaps that's the problem...
>
> Otherwise, check the pg_locks view to see if you can figure it out.
FWIW, I've had this happen a couple of times, too. Unfortunately, it's
happend in the middle of the day so that I had to cancel the processes and
get the system back to normal in too much of a hurry to consider documenting
it.
--
Josh Berkus
Aglio Database Solutions
San Francisco
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Josh Berkus | 2004-04-24 15:35:21 | Re: Why will vacuum not end? |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2004-04-24 02:58:24 | Re: Help with performance problems |