From: | "Mauricio Breternitz" <mbjsql(at)hotmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | concurrent Postgres on NUMA - howto ? |
Date: | 2001-04-23 16:41:31 |
Message-ID: | F28Px33E1ioWwr2UAaT00003e4d@hotmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Folks:
I'm planning a port of Postgres to a multiprocessor
architecture in which all nodes have both local memory
and fast access to a shared memory. Shared memory it more
expensive than local memory.
My intent is to put the shmem & lock structures in
shared memory, but use a copy-in / copy-out approach to
maintain coherence in the buffer cache:
- copy buffer from shared memroy on buffer allocate
- write back buffer to shared memory when it is dirtied.
Is that enough ?
The idea sketch is as follows (mostly, changes
contained to storage/buffer/bufmgr.c):
-change BufferAlloc, etc, to create a node-local copy
of the buffer (from shared memory). Copy both the BufferDesc
entry and the buffer->data array
-change WriteBuffer to copy the (locally changed) buffer
to shared memory (this is the point in which the BM_DIRTY
bit is set). [ I am assuming the buffer is locked & this
is a safe time to make the buffer visible to other backends].
[Assume, for this discussion, that the sem / locks structs in
shared memory have been ported & work ]. Ditto for the hash access.
My concern is whether that is enough to maintain consistency
in the buffer cache (i.e, are there other places in the code
where a backend might have a leftover pointer to somewhere in
the buffer cache ? ) Because, in the scheme above, the buffer
cache is not directly accessible to the backend except via this
copy in / copy -out approach.
[BTW, I think this might be a way of providing a 'cluster'
version of Postgers, by using some global communication module to
obtain/post the 'buffer cache' values]
thanks
regards
Mauricio
mbjsql(at)hotmail(dot)com
_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2001-04-23 17:07:00 | Look what book I found |
Previous Message | Mauricio Breternitz | 2001-04-23 16:16:04 | concurrent postgres in NUMA cluster postgres - design OK ? |