From: | "Subbiah, Stalin" <SSubbiah(at)netopia(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "'josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com'" <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Matt Clark <matt(at)ymogen(dot)net>, "Subbiah, Stalin" <SSubbiah(at)netopia(dot)com>, 'Andrew Sullivan' <ajs(at)crankycanuck(dot)ca>, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [ADMIN] Benchmarking postgres on Solaris/Linux |
Date: | 2004-03-23 20:42:33 |
Message-ID: | F1F84A2E5F9EBD46A9BDB905EB5B103937C2@mxca1.netopia.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
As anyone done performance benchmark testing with solaris sparc/intel linux.
I once read a post here, which had benchmarking test results for using
different filesystem like xfs, ext3, ext2, ufs etc. i couldn't find that
link anymore and google is failing on me, so anyone have the link handy.
Thanks!
-----Original Message-----
From: Josh Berkus [mailto:josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com]
Sent: Tuesday, March 23, 2004 12:13 PM
To: Matt Clark; Subbiah, Stalin; 'Andrew Sullivan';
pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [PERFORM] [ADMIN] Benchmarking postgres on Solaris/Linux
Matt, Stalin,
> As for the compute intensive side (complex joins & sorts etc), the Dell
will
most likely beat the Sun by some distance, although
> what the Sun lacks in CPU power it may make up a bit in memory bandwidth/
latency.
Personally, I've been unimpressed by Dell/Xeon; I think the Sun might do
better than you think, comparitively. On all the Dell servers I've used
so
far, I've not seen performance that comes even close to the hardware specs.
--
-Josh Berkus
Aglio Database Solutions
San Francisco
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Darcy Buskermolen | 2004-03-23 20:48:34 | Fwd: FreeBSD, PostgreSQL, semwait and sbwait! |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2004-03-23 20:32:08 | Re: SLOW query with aggregates |