| From: | Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bharath Rupireddy <bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Use "superuser" instead of "super user" in code comments |
| Date: | 2021-09-07 13:10:28 |
| Message-ID: | F1868DEB-F1F5-49FF-B0F5-95C5FE9FB604@yesql.se |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> On 7 Sep 2021, at 14:44, Bharath Rupireddy <bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> It seems like we use "superuser" as a standard term across the entire
> code base i.e. error messages, docs, code comments. But there are
> still a few code comments that use the term "super user". Can we
> replace those with "superuser"? Attaching a tiny patch to do that.
Good catch, superuser is the term we should use for this. There is one
additional “super user” in src/test/regress/sql/conversion.sql (and its
corresponding resultfile) which can be included in this. Unless there are
objections I’ll apply this with the testfile fixup.
--
Daniel Gustafsson https://vmware.com/
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jesper Pedersen | 2021-09-07 13:16:07 | Increase log level in xlogreader.c ? |
| Previous Message | Bharath Rupireddy | 2021-09-07 12:44:53 | Use "superuser" instead of "super user" in code comments |