RE: [HACKERS] 6.5 beta and ORDER BY patch

From: "Jackson, DeJuan" <djackson(at)cpsgroup(dot)com>
To: Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: jwieck(at)debis(dot)com, hannu(at)trust(dot)ee, hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: RE: [HACKERS] 6.5 beta and ORDER BY patch
Date: 1999-02-02 23:22:45
Message-ID: F10BB1FAF801D111829B0060971D839F63ACE2@cpsmail
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Why don't you regress test it on the CURRENT tree and if it doesn't
break anything submit it? I thought that's what Beta was for (to get
the bugs worked out of the new features), but I'll trust your judgement
on what you think it'll break.
-DEJ

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bruce Momjian [mailto:maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us]
> Sent: Tuesday, February 02, 1999 5:16 PM
> To: jwieck(at)debis(dot)com
> Cc: jwieck(at)debis(dot)com; hannu(at)trust(dot)ee; hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] 6.5 beta and ORDER BY patch
>
>
> > > We haven't started beta yet. Anything on LIMIT?
> >
> > LIMIT is in there and was during entire v6.5 development.
> > But ORDER BY suppressing sort using index wasn't.
> >
>
> Great.
>
> --
> Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle
> maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
> + If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
> + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill,
> Pennsylvania 19026
>

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Daniele Orlandi 1999-02-02 23:57:16 PL/TCL bug (?)
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 1999-02-02 23:16:24 Re: [HACKERS] 6.5 beta and ORDER BY patch