RE: [HACKERS] Novice Question

From: "Jackson, DeJuan" <djackson(at)cpsgroup(dot)com>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)hub(dot)org
Subject: RE: [HACKERS] Novice Question
Date: 1999-01-14 22:00:42
Message-ID: F10BB1FAF801D111829B0060971D839F5E4234@cpsmail
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

OK, this is a complete novice question.
Do we or do we not have temp tables (and/or unnamed tables)?
If we don't why not?
I can see them making quite a few places of current development a lot
easier and flexible. I do realize TANSTAAFL, but as I grok it could be
used for multiple tuple return from functions, the
deferrable-constraints problems, implementing the SQL92 join syntax, and
subselects in from clauses and select lists.

Just more of those ideas,
-DEJ

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 1999-01-14 22:56:53 Re: [HACKERS] Novice Question
Previous Message Matthew C. Aycock 1999-01-14 20:36:17 CVS....