From: | "Jackson, DeJuan" <djackson(at)cpsgroup(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Memphisto <szoli(at)valerie(dot)inf(dot)elte(dot)hu> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL Interfaces <pgsql-interfaces(at)postgreSQL(dot)org> |
Subject: | RE: [GENERAL] My further experiences with ecpg |
Date: | 1998-10-08 16:48:33 |
Message-ID: | F10BB1FAF801D111829B0060971D839F45FE9F@cpsmail |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-interfaces |
Hi,
I found out that I didn't have an exec sql commit at the and of the
program. With that finally psql does know about the table(pgacces still
doesn't).
A question: can this ecpg stuff be used for developing PostgreSQL
applications or shall I forget it go to use libpq?
Thanks in advance
------------------------------------------------------------------------
-=
-------
Sebesty=E9n Zolt=E1n AKA Memphisto It all seems so stupid,
it makes me want to give up.=20
szoli(at)neumann(dot)cs(dot)elte(dot)hu But why should I give up,
when it all seems so stupid?=20
MAKE INSTALL NOT WAR And please avoid Necrosoft
Widows
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Terry Mackintosh | 1998-10-08 18:06:00 | Re: [ADMIN] RE: [HACKERS] Re: [COMMITTERS] 'pgsql/doc/src/sgml protocol.sgml' |
Previous Message | Jackson, DeJuan | 1998-10-08 16:29:23 | RE: [HACKERS] Re: [COMMITTERS] 'pgsql/doc/src/sgml protocol.sgml' |