RE: [HACKERS] Re: partial index

From: "Jackson, DeJuan" <djackson(at)cpsgroup(dot)com>
To: Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, aoki(at)CS(dot)Berkeley(dot)EDU
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)hub(dot)org
Subject: RE: [HACKERS] Re: partial index
Date: 1998-08-12 18:11:53
Message-ID: F10BB1FAF801D111829B0060971D839F39122D@cpsmail
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> I had suspected that's what they were, but never really was sure. Now
> the next question, "Should we rip them out?" No one uses them, and
> they seem to be of very limited usefulness.
>
> I am inclinded to keep them, but I am not sure.
>
Do we have syntax for their creation and is it in the docs?
If not I say just take them out, unless someone can think of a use that
wouldn't be served by normal indexes.
-DEJ

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dr. Michael Meskes 1998-08-12 18:40:05 Re: [HACKERS] Latest ecpg patch?
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 1998-08-12 16:41:39 Re: [HACKERS] Re: type coersion (was OR clause status)