From: | Mark Dilger <mark(dot)dilger(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Paul Ramsey <pramsey(at)cleverelephant(dot)ca> |
Cc: | Pgsql Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [PATCH] random_normal function |
Date: | 2022-12-09 18:39:22 |
Message-ID: | F08A1B23-56E8-49E8-9D0D-4E7CDFBCA702@enterprisedb.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> On Dec 8, 2022, at 1:53 PM, Paul Ramsey <pramsey(at)cleverelephant(dot)ca> wrote:
>
> Just a utility function to generate random numbers from a normal
> distribution. I find myself doing this several times a year, and I am
> sure I must not be the only one.
Thanks for the patch. What do you think about these results?
+-- The semantics of a negative stddev are not well defined
+SELECT random_normal(mean := 0, stddev := -1);
+ random_normal
+---------------------
+ -1.0285744583010896
+(1 row)
+
+SELECT random_normal(mean := 0, stddev := '-Inf');
+ random_normal
+---------------
+ Infinity
+(1 row)
+
+-- This result may be defensible...
+SELECT random_normal(mean := '-Inf', stddev := 'Inf');
+ random_normal
+---------------
+ -Infinity
+(1 row)
+
+-- but if so, why is this NaN?
+SELECT random_normal(mean := 'Inf', stddev := 'Inf');
+ random_normal
+---------------
+ NaN
+(1 row)
+
—
Mark Dilger
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Nathan Bossart | 2022-12-09 18:40:55 | Re: add \dpS to psql |
Previous Message | Jacob Champion | 2022-12-09 18:21:21 | RFC: logical publication via inheritance root? |