From: | "Lane Van Ingen" <lvaningen(at)esncc(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | <pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | How to Force Transactions to Process Serially on A Table |
Date: | 2005-12-19 13:07:20 |
Message-ID: | EKEMKEFLOMKDDLIALABICEGLCGAA.lvaningen@esncc.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-sql |
I am using PL/SQL functions on Windows 2003, version 8.0.1.
I have not used explicit PostgreSQL LOCKing before, but I need some advice
on how properly to use some explicit locking. I think that duplicate key
violations I am now getting are the result.
I want to force transactions being used to update a table to be processed on
a first-come, first-served basis. I want my Pl/sql function to execute to
completion on each transaction before another starts.
Need some advice on how to do this. From what I can read in the docs, it
looks like I need to solve the problem by using the following, but doing so
gives me an SPI_execution error:
BEGIN;
LOCK <table> IN SHARE ROW EXCLUSIVE MODE;
lock adns_report_hour_history in share row exclusive mode;
INSERT INTO <table> VALUES ... - or - UPDATE <table> SET ....
COMMIT;
Will this make the next transaction wait until the previous transaction has
completed? Do I need to set any config parameters?
If you can include an actual code snippet in the response, it would help ...
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andrew Sullivan | 2005-12-19 13:25:24 | Re: Does VACUUM reorder tables on clustered indices |
Previous Message | Richard Huxton | 2005-12-19 09:08:09 | Re: Rule causes baffling error |