From: | "Hiroshi Inoue" <Inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp> |
---|---|
To: | "Jan Wieck" <wieck(at)hub(dot)org> |
Cc: | "pgsql-hackers" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>, <pgsql-committers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | RE: pgsql/src/backend/commands (command.c vacuum.c) |
Date: | 2000-12-09 13:23:22 |
Message-ID: | EKEJJICOHDIEMGPNIFIJOEBLDBAA.Inoue@tpf.co.jp |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers |
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jan Wieck
> Sent: Thursday, July 06, 2000 1:18 AM
> To: pgsql-committers(at)postgresql(dot)org
> Subject: [COMMITTERS] pgsql/src/backend/commands (command.c vacuum.c)
>
>
> Date: Wednesday, July 5, 2000 @ 12:17:41
> Author: wieck
>
> Update of /home/projects/pgsql/cvsroot/pgsql/src/backend/commands
> from hub.org:/tmp/cvs-serv21402/backend/commands
>
> Modified Files:
> command.c vacuum.c
>
> ----------------------------- Log Message -----------------------------
>
> Changed TOAST relations to have relkind RELKIND_TOASTVALUE.
>
> Special handling of TOAST relations during VACUUM. TOAST relations
> are vacuumed while the lock on the master table is still active.
>
It seems very dangerous to me.
When VACUUM of a master table was finished, the transaction is
in already committed state in many cases.
Regards.
Hiroshi Inoue
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2000-12-09 15:52:05 | Re: pgsql/src/backend/commands (command.c vacuum.c) |
Previous Message | momjian | 2000-12-09 04:57:32 | pgsql/doc/src/FAQ (FAQ_DEV.html) |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Oleg Bartunov | 2000-12-09 13:41:37 | Re: OK, does anyone have any better ideas? |
Previous Message | Hiroshi Inoue | 2000-12-09 13:23:09 | RE: [HACKERS] Japan pictures |