From: | "Hiroshi Inoue" <Inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp> |
---|---|
To: | "Bruce Momjian" <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Jan Wieck" <janwieck(at)yahoo(dot)com>, "Jessica Perry Hekman" <jphekman(at)dynamicdiagrams(dot)com>, "Barry Lind" <barry(at)xythos(dot)com>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: timeout implementation issues |
Date: | 2002-04-08 17:56:08 |
Message-ID: | EKEJJICOHDIEMGPNIFIJMELIHGAA.Inoue@tpf.co.jp |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bruce Momjian [mailto:pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us]
>
> Hiroshi Inoue wrote:
> > > I am confused. Above you state you want SET QUERY_TIMEOUT to be
> > > per-query. I assume you mean that the timeout applies for
> only the next
> > > query and is turned off after that.
> >
> > Hmm there seems a misunderstanding between you and I but I
> > don't see what it is. Does *SET QUERY_TIMEOUT* start a timer in
> > your scenario ? In my scenario *SET QUERY_TIMEOUT* only
> > registers the timeout value for subsequent queries.
>
> SET QUERY_TIMEOUT does not start a timer. It makes sure each query
> after the SET is timed and automatically canceled if the single query
> exceeds the timeout interval.
OK using your example, one by one
BEGIN WORK;
SET query_timeout=20;
query fails;
SET query_timeout=0;
For what the SET was issued ?
What command is issued if the query was successful ?
COMMIT WORK;
regards,
Hiroshi Inoue
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Hiroshi Inoue | 2002-04-08 17:56:27 | Re: timeout implementation issues |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2002-04-08 17:41:31 | Re: What's the CURRENT schema ? |