| From: | "Hiroshi Inoue" <Inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Bruce Momjian" <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Jan Wieck" <janwieck(at)yahoo(dot)com>, "Jessica Perry Hekman" <jphekman(at)dynamicdiagrams(dot)com>, "Barry Lind" <barry(at)xythos(dot)com>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: timeout implementation issues |
| Date: | 2002-04-08 21:14:46 |
| Message-ID: | EKEJJICOHDIEMGPNIFIJKEMCHGAA.Inoue@tpf.co.jp |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bruce Momjian [mailto:pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us]
> >
> > OK using your example, one by one
> >
> > BEGIN WORK;
> > SET query_timeout=20;
> > query fails;
> > SET query_timeout=0;
> >
> > For what the SET was issued ?
> > What command is issued if the query was successful ?
> >
> > COMMIT WORK;
>
> Here, SET should only to the query labeled "query fails".
Why should the SET query_timeout = 0 command be issued
only when the query failed ? Is it a JDBC driver's requirement
or some applications' requirements which uses the JDBC driver ?
regards,
Hiroshi Inoue
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2002-04-08 21:15:41 | Re: timeout implementation issues |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2002-04-08 18:05:03 | Re: timeout implementation issues |