RE: Proposed WAL changes

From: "Hiroshi Inoue" <Inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp>
To: "Zeugswetter Andreas SB" <ZeugswetterA(at)wien(dot)spardat(dot)at>, "'Tom Lane'" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: RE: Proposed WAL changes
Date: 2001-03-07 04:38:42
Message-ID: EKEJJICOHDIEMGPNIFIJKEMBDMAA.Inoue@tpf.co.jp
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Zeugswetter Andreas SB
>
> > >> Remove archdir from pg_control; it ought to be a GUC
> > >> parameter, not a special case (not that it's implemented
> > yet anyway).
> >
> > > Is archdir really a GUC parameter ?
> >
> > Why shouldn't it be? I see nothing wrong with changing it on-the-fly.
>
> Yes, I think this is a good change, like all others except XID
> assignment :-)
>

Could GUC parameters be changed permanently e.g. by SET command ?

For example,
1) start postmaster
2) set archdir to '....'
3) shutdown postmaster

Does PostgreSQL remember the archdir parameter ?

Regards,
Hiroshi Inoue

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2001-03-07 05:16:03 Re: Proposed WAL changes
Previous Message Hiroshi Inoue 2001-03-07 04:38:36 RE: How to shoot yourself in the foot: kill -9 postmaster