| From: | "Hiroshi Inoue" <Inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | "Hackers" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: BETWEEN Node & DROP COLUMN |
| Date: | 2002-07-06 15:43:26 |
| Message-ID: | EKEJJICOHDIEMGPNIFIJKELOIEAA.Inoue@tpf.co.jp |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Tom Lane [mailto:tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us]
>
> "Christopher Kings-Lynne" <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au> writes:
> > OK, I've been looking at Hiroshi's implementation. It's basically
> > semantically equivalent to mine from what I can see so far. The only
> > difference really is in how the dropped columns are marked.
>
> True enough, but that's not a trivial difference. The problem with
> Hiroshi's implementation is that there's no longer a close tie between
> pg_attribute.attnum and physical positions of datums in tuples. I think
> that that's going to affect a lot of low-level code, and that he hasn't
> found all of it.
Please don't propagate an unfair valuation without any verification.
regards,
Hiroshi Inoue
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jochem van Dieten | 2002-07-06 16:15:39 | Re: I am being interviewed by OReilly |
| Previous Message | Rich Shepard | 2002-07-06 15:32:05 | Re: I am being interviewed by OReilly |