From: | "Hiroshi Inoue" <Inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp> |
---|---|
To: | "Bruce Momjian" <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | "PostgreSQL-development" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org> |
Subject: | RE: ODBC backward versions |
Date: | 2001-02-11 13:11:46 |
Message-ID: | EKEJJICOHDIEMGPNIFIJIEBLDJAA.Inoue@tpf.co.jp |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bruce Momjian
> Sent: Sunday, February 11, 2001 11:01 AM
> To: PostgreSQL-development
> Subject: [HACKERS] ODBC backward versions
>
>
> I checked the logs, and we released the new 6.4 backend protocol on
> 1998-10-30. That was 2.5 years ago.
>
> We normally allow older clients to communicate with newer servers, but
> often we don't support newer clients talking to older servers, sometimes
> even servers one release in the past. The reason is that the backend
> communication code gets confusing. For example, I know there were some
> libpq releases that could not talk to servers from the previous release.
Libpq 2.x couldn't talk to pre-6.4 servers. Fortunately ODBC has never
used libpq and could talk to wide range of versions. Should ODBC
throw away the luck ?
> We did allow newer servers to talk to older clients because it is harder
> to upgrade many clients than a single server.
>
> Seems the <=6.3 compatibility code in our current ODBC is just adding
> confusion for coders and users and should be removed. Tom Lane agreed.
>
Where's real coders for psqlodbc driver in the first place ?
Byron has been unavailable for a long time and I've seen
few improvements for a year or so. Does removing pre-6.4
code improve the status ? The problem is that there has
been no maintainer of odbc driver.
Regards,
Hiroshi Inoue
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2001-02-11 13:17:13 | Re: [ODBC] RE: [PATCHES] Fix for ODBC close |
Previous Message | Hiroshi Inoue | 2001-02-11 13:10:56 | RE: [ODBC] RE: [PATCHES] Fix for ODBC close |